USPTO serial 78288562
THE ART OF THE PERFECT CUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ART OF THE PERFECT CUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barton M. Zedd
BARTON M ZEDD KRAFT FOODS HOLDINGS INCTHREE LKS DRNORTHFIELD, IL 60093UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by Kraft Foods Schweiz Holding AG
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named THE ART OF THE PERFECT CUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |