USPTO serial 78288583
THE PROUD FAMILY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE PROUD FAMILY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Steinberg
CHARLES STEINBERG THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VIS STBURBANK, CA 91521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit preserves; fruit-based snack food; jams; jellies; potato chips; roasted nuts; milk; flavored milk drinks, namely, chocolate milk; vanilla-flavored milk; strawberry-flavored milk; and yogurt drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |