Drawing for MASTERCARD PAYROLL CARD. UNA MEJOR FORMA DE COBRAR EL SUELDO.

USPTO serial 78288693

MASTERCARD PAYROLL CARD. UNA MEJOR FORMA DE COBRAR EL SUELDO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERCARD PAYROLL CARD. UNA MEJOR FORMA DE COBRAR EL SUELDO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colm J. Dobbyn

Colm J. Dobbyn MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED2000 Purchase StreetPURCHASE, NY 10577-2509UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES; NAMELY BANKING AND CREDIT CARD, DEBIT CARD, AND STORED VALUE PREPAID CARD SERVICES; REMOTE BILL PAYMENT SERVICES; STORED VALUE ELECTRONIC PURSE SERVICES, PROVIDING ELECTRONIC FUNDS AND CURRENCY TRANSFER SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA, PREPAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES, CASH DISBURSEMENT SERVICES, AND TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION AND SETTLEMENT SERVICES; PROVISION OF DEBIT CARD AND CREDIT CARD SERVICES BY MEANS OF RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICES KNOWN AS TRANSPONDERS; TRAVEL INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY, TRAVEL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING; CHEQUE VERIFICATION SERVICES; ISSUANCE OF TRAVELERS' CHECKS AND VOUCHERS; THE PROVISION OF FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR THE SUPPORT OF RETAIL SERVICES PROVIDED THROUGH MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS MEANS, NAMELY, BILL PAYMENT SERVICES THROUGH WIRELESS DEVICES; BILL PAYMENT SERVICES PROVIDED THROUGH A WEBSITE; ON-LINE BANKINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance