USPTO serial 78288721
MASTER CODE OTOMOTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASTER CODE OTOMOTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian H. Batzli
BRIAN H BATZLI MERCHANT & GOULD, PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Keyless automobile entry systems comprising signal processors, electrical wires, electronic connectors, receivers, remote controls, electronic actuators, electronic keypads; anti-intrusion alarms; electrical circuits for vehicle anti-theft/anti-carjack alarms; battery operated electronic transmitters; remote control systems comprising remote controls, transmitters, and receivers; telematic systems and position control and monitoring systems for vehicles and their components and accessories, namely, voice activated computer hardware and software for use in controlling automotive telematic terminals, transponder units for preventing theft of vehicles; vehicle locating, tracking, and security system comprised of an antenna and radio transmitter to be placed in a vehicle; location finding and tracking devices, namely, transponder units, antennas, radio transmitters, radio receivers; emergency warning lights; radio scanners, radar detectors, laser speed detectors and related accessories sold as a unit therewith; electronic satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system [GPS]; two-way radios; citizen band radios; mobile radios; marine radios; weather radios; marine water thermometers; marine wind direction meters; marine directional compasses; marine fish finders; battery chargers; accessories for all of the aforesaid goods, namely, antennas, antenna mounts, microphones, speakers, coaxial cables, battery chargers and power inverters; electrical fuses, electrical wire connectors and electrical battery terminal connectors | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Antitheft alarms for vehicles; burglar alarms for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |