USPTO serial 78288788
THE WORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE WORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin S. Costanza
KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLLSTE 6300701 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98104-7092Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | market research and analysis services, including in the field of consumer goods and advertising; conducting marketing and advertising surveys, studies, analyses and evaluations; conducting surveys, studies, analyses and evaluations and providing information on consumer and public attitudes and on the effectiveness of advertising; consultancy in the field of advertising and marketing; market research and information services in the field of gathering, analysis, measurement, manipulation, provision and presentation of information, namely, market survey data, consumer research data and socio-demographic data and of responses of selective audiences to stimulus material, namely, advertisements, videos, films, news items, debates, packaging designs, newspapers, magazines, radio and television programs, and web sites; market research and analysis services in the field of consumer goods and advertising; conducting marketing and advertising surveys, studies, analyses and evaluations; conducting surveys, studies, analyses and evaluations and providing information on consumer and public attitudes and on the effectiveness of advertising; consultancy in the field of advertising and marketing; research and information services relating to the gathering, analysis, measurement, manipulation, provision and presentation of information, namely, market survey data, consumer research data and socio-demographic data and of responses of selective audiences to stimulus material, namely, advertisements, videos, films, news items, debates, packaging designs, newspapers, magazines, radio and television programs, and web sites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |