USPTO serial 78288912
PENTAX PRECISION INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PENTAX PRECISION INSTRUMENT CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven T. Shelton
STEVEN T SHELTON CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and peripherals relating to endoscopy; computer software and hardware for use in endoscopic medical procedures; computer software and hardware for endoscopic image analysis and management | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, endoscopes and endoscopic cameras, namely, gastrointestinal endoscopes, bronchoscopes, intubation scopes, ear, nose, and throat scopes, flexible endoscopes, and their structural parts and accessories; endoscopic ultrasound devices; endoscopic video systems consisting of video cameras, video processors, video modules, color video printers, color video monitors and videocassette recorders; irrigators for use during endoscopy; pumps for use during endoscopy, namely, irrigator pumps and suction pumps; lamps for use in endoscopic equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Endoscopic equipment carts | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of optical and endoscopic apparatus and instruments; maintenance and repair of computer hardware systems and peripheral equipment relating to endoscopy | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Maintenance and repair of computer software relating to endoscopy; technical assistance in connection the use and maintenance of endoscopic equipment; custom design of optical and endoscopic apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pentax Precision Instrument Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PENTAX PRECISION INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |