USPTO serial 78289097
HIGH INTENSITY DIRECTIONAL ACOUSTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS JR, RAY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGH INTENSITY DIRECTIONAL ACOUSTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
PETER M DE JONGETHORPE N & WESTERN LLPPO BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LOUDSPEAKERS; LOUDSPEAKERS FOR USE AS A NON-LETHAL WEAPON | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |