USPTO serial 78289107
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dioptics Medical Products, Inc.
Smithfield, RI
Dioptics Medical Products, Inc.
San Luis Obispo, CA
Dioptics Medical Products, Inc.
San Luis Obispo, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay Lyn Schwartz
Kay Lyn Schwartz Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP1601 Elm StreetDallas, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Reading Glasses, ] Sunglasses, Clip-On Sunglasses, Eyeglass Cases, [ Eyeglass Chains, ] Eyeglass Cords, Eyeglass Cleaning Kits comprised of eyeglass cleaning cloths | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 10, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |