Drawing for OUR FAMILY ALWAYS

USPTO serial 78289110

OUR FAMILY ALWAYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OUR FAMILY ALWAYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter M. de Jonge

PETER M DE JONGETHORPE N & WESTERN LLPPO BOX 1219SANDY, UT 84091-1219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed display media, namely printed paper signs, certificates and cards featuring instructional, motivational, evocative and religious messages; photograph mounts; printed paper signs, printed certificates; printed emblems; engraving plates, namely, printed and photo-engraved face platesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 21, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance