USPTO serial 78289351
AURIGA MEDICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3449385Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2008
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AURIGA MEDICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
38110 Braunschweig, DE
38110 Braunschweig, DE
BRAUNSCHWEIG, DE
BRAUNSCHWEIG, DE
ECKERT & ZIEGLER NUCLITEC GMBH
BRAUNSCHWEIG, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Simmons
REX A DONNELLY RATNERPRESTIAPO BOX 15961007 ORANGE ST STE 1100WILMINGTON, DE 19899Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary products and preparations, namely pharmaceuticals preparations for medical and clinical radiation therapy and for functional imaging; radiopharmaceuticals used in the treatment of impaired cell or tissue growth such as in cancer, or restinosis or treatment of macular degeneration, brachytherapy, leukemia, immuno therapy, treatment of arthritis, pain relief in cancer; in vivo and in vitro diagnostic agents for medical purposes, especially radioactive labeled diagnostic agents; radiopharmaceuticals used for functional imaging, namely, diagnostic radiopharmaceutical preparations; in vivo and in vitro diagnostic agents for functional imaging for medical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Devices for calibration of radioactivity measuring equipment; radioactive standards, namely standards for calibrating of measuring instruments for use in radio diagnostics and radiotherapy or for research uses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Radiation sources for medical purposes, especially for radiation therapy, for imaging purposes and for diagnostical purposes, namely, radioactive seeds, radioisotopes, reactor-produced radio isotopes, cyclotrons-produced radiation isotopes, naturally occurring isotopes, ring radioisotopes, artificially produced radio isotopes; cobalt-60, iodine-131, iridium-192, strontium-89, samarium-153, rhenium-186, boron-10, techneticum-99m, molybdenum-99, rubidium-82, lutetium-177, ytterbium-176, ytterbium-177, yttrium-90, bismuth-213, chromium-51, copper-64, dysprosium-165, erbium-169, holmium-166, iodine-125, iron-59, palladium-103, phosphorus-32, potassium-42, rhenium-188, selenium-75, sodium-24, xenon-133, ytterbium-169, carbon-11, cobalt-57, gallium-67, gallium-68, indium-111, iodine-123, iodine-124, thallium-201, thulium-170; radiation sources for implantation, namely, implantable radiation therapy devices consisting of radioactive seeds and a bioabsorbable carrier assembly; catheters; applicators for radiopharmaceuticals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AEA Technology QSA GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by AEA Technology QSA GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by QSA GLOBAL GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by QSA GLOBAL GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by ECKERT & ZIEGLER NUCLITEC GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named AURIGA MEDICAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 2, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |