Drawing for POOL TERRAZZO

USPTO serial 78289411

POOL TERRAZZO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POOL TERRAZZO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LaValle D. Ptak

LAVALLE D PTAK LAW OFFICE OF LAVALLE PTAK28435 N 42ND STCAVE CREEK, AZ 85331UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019MATERIALS FOR SIDEWALK, PATIO AND SWIMMING POOL CONSTRUCTION, NAMELY AGGREGATE MATERIAL COMPOSED OF NATURAL STONE PEBBLESACTIVEJan 29, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 5, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2005ABNDABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB—
Jun 29, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 29, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 2, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 3, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance