USPTO serial 78289575
SURE CODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURE CODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Freedman
SUSAN M FREEDMAN NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Printers, namely High Resolution Printers | ACTIVE | Nov 14, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |