Drawing for EKENA

USPTO serial 78290135

EKENA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EKENA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL L LOVITZ

MICHAEL L LOVITZ Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020furniture, mirrors, picture frames; goods of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, and meerschaum, and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastic, namely armchairs, figurines, office furniture, namely, chairs, desks, computer desks, filing and storage cabinets, book and storage shelves and functional accessories, namely, hutches; upholstered, semi-upholstered, metal, glass and wood occasional furniture; namely, tables, entertainment units, desks, computer and home office furniture; bedroom furniture, namely, beds, dressers, chests of drawers, night stands, dressing tables, armoires; household furniture, namely dining room tables, recliners, sofas, loveseats, occasional tables; bedroom furniture; screens; outdoor furniture; living room furniture, wall unitsACTIVE—
035home furnishing retail store servicesACTIVE—
042interior decorating servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 9, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance