Drawing for CLINICNET

USPTO serial 78290166

CLINICNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLINICNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AJAY A. JAGTIANI

AJAY A JAGTIANI JAGTIANI & GUTTAG10363-A DEMOCRACY LNFAIRFAX, VA 22030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Instructional services, namely, providing training by means of a global computer network in the implantation, fitting, operation and use of medical equipment and associated software in the field of hearing prosthesesACTIVE—
042Technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems in the field of the use and operation of medical equipment and associated software for others in the field of hearing prostheses; engineering services in the field of the use and operation of medical equipment and associated software in the field of hearing prostheses; technical supervision in the field of the use and operation of medical equipment and associate software in the field of hearing prosthesesACTIVE—
044Health care services, namely, health care advisory and consultancy services, namely, providing health care information by means of a global computer network regarding the use and operation of medical equipment and associated software in the field of hearing prostheses, computer services, namely, providing health care databases featuring medical information and advice regarding the implantation, fitting, operation and use of hearing prostheses and associated softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2004NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
May 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance