Drawing for CHEFSBEST

USPTO serial 78290427

CHEFSBEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3211763Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 20, 2007
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with CHEFSBEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd J. Langford,

Todd J. Langford, REDEN & REDEN, APC16885 VIA DEL CAMPO COURTSUITE 320SAN DIEGO, CA 92127

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others by providing recognition, awards and incentives in the fields of food and beverage products and services, commercial foodservice-related durable products, consumer food and beverage related durable products, foodservice products; business networking; conducting marketing studies activities, namely, studies regarding chefs, restaurateurs and consumersACTIVE—
043Providing information in the fields of food and beverage products and services, commercial foodservice-related durable products, consumer food and beverage related durable products, foodservice productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 17, 2017NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
May 17, 2017NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Jun 18, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 18, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 17, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 30, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2014NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 201415AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Mar 20, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 201415AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Mar 19, 2014E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2013NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 20138.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Aug 30, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 15, 20138.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Aug 15, 2013ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 25, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 10, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 10, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 13, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 18, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 4, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 28, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance