Drawing for JUST TURKEY

USPTO serial 78290458

JUST TURKEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUST TURKEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wayne A. Sivertson

WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON PA3433 BROADWAY ST NE STE 401BROADWAY PL EMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413-3009

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fresh turkey, frozen turkey, processed turkey, and cured turkeyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 31, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 31, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 27, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 10, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 20, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 13, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance