Drawing for TRUVOX

USPTO serial 78290483

TRUVOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3252863Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUVOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcy L. Sperry, Esq.

Marcy L. Sperry, Esq. Sperry IP Law LLC3550 Lenox Rd NE21st FloorAtlanta, GA 30326

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS, AND DETERGENTS, ALL FOR USE IN CLEANING FLOORS OR FLOOR COVERINGSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
007CLEANING, SHAMPOOING, SCRUBBING AND ABRADING MACHINES, ALL FOR USE ON FLOORS AND FLOOR COVERINGS; SEALING MACHINES, ALL FOR USE ON FLOORS AND FLOOR COVERINGS; FLOOR STAINING AND POLISHING MACHINES; VACUUM CLEANING MACHINES USED FOR INDUSTRIAL AND DOMESTIC PURPOSESSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
021NON-ELECTRIC CLEANING AND SWEEPING BROOMS AND BRUSHES, ALL FOR USE ON CARPETS AND FLOOR COVERINGS; NON-ELECTRIC INSTRUMENTS AND MATERIALS, ALL FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, NAMELY, MOPS, CARPET SWEEPERS, CARPET BEATERS ALL FOR USE ON CARPETS AND FLOOR COVERINGS; FLOOR BRUSHES; TRASH CANSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 20, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
May 20, 2013ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 19, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 12, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 29, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 12, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 21, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance