USPTO serial 78290485
GRIP-N-RIP-IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRIP-N-RIP-IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew R. Basile, Registration No. 24,753
ANDREW R BASILE REGISTRATION NO 24 75 YOUNG & BASILE, PCSTE 6243001 W BIG BEAVER RDTROY, MI 48084-3107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TRAINING DEVICE FOR LEARNING TO PLAY GOLF | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |