USPTO serial 78290561
SURE START
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURE START?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Szuhaj
TIMOTHY J. SZUHAJ SPECTOR GADON & ROSEN, P.C.BUILDING 11000 LANOLA ROAD, SUITE 203MAPLE SHADE, NJ 08052Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | NUTRITIONAL BASE MIX COMPOSED OF WHEY PROTEIN, MILK CALCIUM AND SOLUBLE FIBER ADDED TO FOODS, NAMELY MEAL ENTREES AND SNACKS CONTAINING MEAT, FISH AND POULTRY, EGGS, MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS SUCH AS MILKSHAKES, PUDDINGS, DRIED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, JELLIES AND FRUIT SAUCES | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | NUTRITIONAL BASE MIX COMPOSED OF WHEY PROTEIN, MILK CALCIUM AND SOLUBLE FIBER ADDED TO MEAL ENTREES, SNACKS AND DESSERTS, NAMELY FOR MUFFINS, BREADS, RICE, SAUCES, GRAVIES, SALAD DRESSINGS, FROZEN BARS AND ICES, SHERBET, COFFEE, COCOA AND TEA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutri/System IPHC, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutri/System IPHC, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SURE START
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |