USPTO serial 78290636
STRATODERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRATODERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Clifford
JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cellular components, namely, oil bodies cells, oil body cellular proteins, proteins, fusion proteins, oil body associated cellular proteins and recombinant proteins extracted from living organisms, namely, plants, plant seeds, yeast and bacteria, all for use as an ingredient in the manufacture of cosmetics, cosmeceuticals, pharmaceuticals,nutraceuticals, vitamins, dietary supplements, foods, ingredients for foods, perfumery, toiletries, skin care preparations, and hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |