USPTO serial 78290641
SHAID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2005
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHAID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
STATELINE, NV
STATELINE, NV
Danville, CA
Danville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra Edelman,
J. Scott Gerien DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY1455 FIRST STREET, STE 301NAPA, CA 94559-2822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Liqueurs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 7, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAJESTIC BRANDS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAJESTIC BRANDS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAJESTIC BRANDS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Refreshment Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named SHAID
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |