Drawing for FUNERGY

USPTO serial 78291036

FUNERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUNERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electromechanical apparatus for preparing and dispensing hot and cold beverages and/or prepared foods for household and professional use, namely, electric agitators, electric coffee grinders, electric mixers, electric food processorsACTIVE—
009Apparatus for preparing and dispensing hot and cold beverages or prepared food, namely, automatic vending machinesACTIVE—
011Heated or refrigerated beverage dispensers; heated or refrigerated coffee dispensers; electric hot beverage making machines; aerated beverage making machines; ice cream makersACTIVE—
029Milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; preserved, dried, rebydrated and cooked fruits and vegetables; bouillons; soups; vegetable potages and pureesACTIVE—
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, coffee-based beverages containing milk, tea-based beverages, cocoa-based beveragesACTIVE—
032Non-alcoholic drinks, namely, soft drinks; fruit and vegetable drinks; fruit and vegetable juices; syrups, extracts and essences for making non-alcoholic, non-carbonated soft drinksACTIVE—
043Restaurant, hotel, cafe, snack-bar and canteen servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance