USPTO serial 78291460
DEM BOYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEM BOYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAHEED,ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
LAUREL, MD
Other trademarks owned by SAHEED,ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
SAHEED,ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
LAUREL, MD
Other trademarks owned by SAHEED,ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
LAUREL, MD
ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
LAUREL, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Music production services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAHEED,ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
- Other trademarks owned by SAHEED,ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
- Other trademarks owned by ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
- Other trademarks owned by ABDULQUDUS,O OBONG,UWEMEDIMO,N
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DEM BOYZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |