Drawing for ONE EIGHTIES

USPTO serial 78291579

ONE EIGHTIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE EIGHTIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Lynch

Thomas W. Lynch Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLCSuite 4001901 Research BoulevardRockville, MD 20850

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, tops and bottoms, jackets, coats, warm-up suits, sweatsuits, sweat pants, sweatshirts, sweaters, blazers, vests, pants, trousers, slacks, shorts, underwear, thermal underwear, swimwear, loungewear, ear warmers, ear muffs, gloves, mittens, scarves, wristbands, skiwear, tights, foul weather gear, beach wear, unitards, body suits, fishing vests and waders, sleepwear, robes, caftans, neckwear, overalls, pantsuits, suits, suit coats, rainwear, sashes, belts, shawls, socks; headwear, namely, headbands and hats; and footwear, namely, shoes, boots and sandals, excluding distribution and/or sale of the foregoing to or through religious organizations or religious youth ministriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 10, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 20, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 6, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance