USPTO serial 78291672
FAMILY SEAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAMILY SEAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Neots, Huntingdonshire, GB
St. Neots, Huntingdonshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeff Rothenberg
JEFF ROTHENBERG HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY AND MESITI PC5 COLUMBIA CIRALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | (Based on Intent to Use) Toilet bowls; toilet cisterns; bidets; portable toilets; disinfectant dispensers for toilets; toilets with washing functions; (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e)) toilet seats; toilet seat lids; toilet seats with automatic sanitary cover replacement before use; sanitary covers of plastic for toilet seats; (Based on Intent to Use) and parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e)) Toilet seat covers of cellulose; (Based on Intent to Use) paper toilet seat covers; toilet paper; disinfecting toilet paper; toilet tissues; towels of paper; and paper tissues | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e)) Toilet seat cover dispensers; (Based on Intent to Use) dispensers for toilet paper; toilet roll holders; towel hooks, not of metal; towel holders, namely towel loops, not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rymax Designs Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Rymax Designs Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named FAMILY SEAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |