Drawing for MCFLY

USPTO serial 78291704

MCFLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MCFLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee B. Beitchman

LEE B BEITCHMAN BEITCHMAN & HUDSON215 14TH ST NWATLANTA, GA 30318UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, live performances by a musical band.ACTIVESep 8, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 16, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance