USPTO serial 78291785
NDURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NDURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Dore
Trisha A. Dore Accupro Trademark Services LLP401 West Georgia StreetSuite 702Vancouver, V6B 5A1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Tool accessories sold to the construction and electrical industries, namely, tool holders; tool holsters; toolbelts; hammer rings for attachment to tool belts; tool aprons; bucket caddies in the nature of tool holders for attachment to a bucket | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | Specialty holster for carrying cellular phones, pages and personal digital assistants | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | Tool accessories sold to the construction and electrical industries, namely, empty work bags for tools and accessories; tool pouches sold empty | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Accessories sold to the construction electrical industries, namely, suspenders | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Caplan Industries Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Caplan Industries Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named NDURA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |