CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for COMPREHENSIVE NEURO MUSCULAR PROFILER CNMP

USPTO serial 78291877

COMPREHENSIVE NEURO MUSCULAR PROFILER CNMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COMPREHENSIVE NEURO MUSCULAR PROFILER CNMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert .S. Lipton

ROBERT S TREB LIPTON LIPTON, WEINBERGER, HUSICK201 N JACKSON ST PO BOX 934MEDIA, PA 19063UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical diagnostic device that is used to detect physical abnormalities in various muscle groups related to soft tissue injuriesACTIVEJan 7, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 26, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 19, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 11, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2006SPRASU - PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Oct 12, 2006SPRASU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN—
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 1, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 1, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 23, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 30, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 20041.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jan 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance