USPTO serial 78292043
STAR MODELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STAR MODELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Minyama, Queensland, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angeline Behan
ANGELINE BEHAN AHEARN FOXBRISBANE, QUEENSLAND 4000LEVEL 24 141 QUEEN ST,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distribution of pre-recorded audio and video discs, computer software, DVDs and CD-ROMs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of motion picture films, television programs and web cast programs; production of pre-recorded audio and video cassettes; production of pre-recorded audio and video tapes and pre-recorded audio and video discs; publication of electronic books and journals online; providing online information in the field of entertainment, namely, information in the field of motion picture films, television programs, web cast programs, music and video clips and commentary and articles about motion picture films, television programs, web cast programs, music and video clips, all transmitted through a web site via a global computer network; organization of beauty pageants; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of live shows; library services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |