Drawing for STAR MODELS

USPTO serial 78292043

STAR MODELS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STAR MODELS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angeline Behan

ANGELINE BEHAN AHEARN FOXBRISBANE, QUEENSLAND 4000LEVEL 24 141 QUEEN ST,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Distribution of pre-recorded audio and video discs, computer software, DVDs and CD-ROMsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of motion picture films, television programs and web cast programs; production of pre-recorded audio and video cassettes; production of pre-recorded audio and video tapes and pre-recorded audio and video discs; publication of electronic books and journals online; providing online information in the field of entertainment, namely, information in the field of motion picture films, television programs, web cast programs, music and video clips and commentary and articles about motion picture films, television programs, web cast programs, music and video clips, all transmitted through a web site via a global computer network; organization of beauty pageants; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of live shows; library servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 10, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance