CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MAG TECH

USPTO serial 78292141

MAG TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3252864Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MAG TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley R. Moore

Stanley R. Moore Winstead PCP.O. Box 131851Dallas, TX 75313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND RADIO FREQUENCY-BASED IDENTIFICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, RADIO FREQUENCY PROXIMITY TAGS AND TRANSPONDERS FOR USE IN IDENTIFICATION, TRACKING, AND TRACING APPLICATIONS PERTAINING TO THE SHIPMENT OF GOODS, NAMELY, FOOD, MEDICAL SUPPLIES, DOCUMENTS, MAIL, OR PACKAGES AND BAGGAGE; RADIO FREQUENCY-BASED IDENTIFICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, RADIO FREQUENCY PROXIMITY TAGS ATTACHED TO FOBS FOR MONITORING SECURITY ACCESS OR IDENTIFICATION; RADIO FREQUENCY TRANSPONDER TAGS ATTACHED TO GOODS FOR TRACING AND TRACKING THE MOVEMENT OF THOSE GOODS AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION TAGS ATTACHED TO GOODS FOR IDENTIFYING THOSE GOODS; TRANSPONDERSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 24, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Sep 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 2007IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 6, 2007ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Feb 6, 2007ADBS1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED—
Feb 2, 2007PCBGPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 22, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 28, 2006PDCBPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 19, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 2006MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2006REINREINSTATED—
Dec 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 10, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 13, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 17, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance