USPTO serial 78292227
BROMBERG BROS. BLUE RIBBON RESTAURANTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BROMBERG BROS. BLUE RIBBON RESTAURANTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brendan P. McFeely
Brendan P. McFeely KANE KESSLER, PC666 Third AvenueNEW YORK, NY 10017-4041UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chili sauce; hot sauce; salad dressings; mayonnaise; horseradish; tartar sauce; egg rolls; seasonings; processed herbs, namely herb mixes for flavoring food; spices; frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; bakery goods; sauces for topping desserts; bread; rolls; dumplings; rice; sushi | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Broco, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Broco, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Broco, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BLUE RIBBON IP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BROMBERG BROS. BLUE RIBBON RESTAURANTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 13, 2015 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |