Drawing for Serial No. 78292228

USPTO serial 78292228

Serial No. 78292228

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78292228?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029snacks, namely, potato chips, onion rings, fried pork rinds, processed nuts, dry dip mix excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips and non-dairy based canned dipsACTIVE—
030cheese-flavored puffed corn snacks, tortilla chips, popped popcorn, corn chips, cheese snack crackers, peanut butter snack crackers, cookies and browniesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 1, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 11, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 7, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 30, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 13, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 10, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance