Drawing for PROACTIV

USPTO serial 78292301

PROACTIV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROACTIV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on 44(d) and 44(e)) Electronic air pollution monitoring systems, comprised of air pollution monitors, particle detectors, gas detectors, bio-hazards detectors, smoke detectors, fire detectors; computer hardware and software used to monitor air pollution, and detect particles, gas, biohazards, smoke and fire, and parts therefore; electronic control fire alarm systems, comprised of computer hardware and software, electronic controls, input and output devices, namely, fire alarm control panels, environmental monitoring and control panels and parts thereforACTIVE—
037(Based on Intent to Use) Installing, maintenance and repair of fire, security or safety alarm systems; ongoing maintenance, checking and repair of fire, security or safety alarm systemsACTIVE—
045(Based on Intent to Use) Integrated electronic and digital security and surveillance monitoring services for the protection of property and individuals; monitoring of security alarm systems; monitoring of fire alarm systems; and consultation in the field of integrated electronic and digital security and surveillance monitoring systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 21, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 4, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 4, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 12, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance