Drawing for FIT IX

USPTO serial 78292364

FIT IX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIT IX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication equipment and apparatus, namely, optical and electrical multiplexers, optical and electrical switches, optical and electrical cross-connects, computers and computer peripheralsACTIVE—
035Commercial representation, namely, manufacturer representatives in the field of telecommunication; importation and exportation agencies of products; distribution and commercialization of computer components, namely, wholesale distributorships featuring computer componentsACTIVE—
037Computer installation and maintenanceACTIVE—
038Advisory services in the telecommunication fieldACTIVE—
041Training courses in the use and operation of computersACTIVE—
042Computer software design for others including development and implementation of projects through computer software; rental of computer software; maintenance of computer software; consultancy services in processes and information technology, namely, computer software consultation; computer consultation; technical assistance for computers, namely, technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance