USPTO serial 78292373
TROJAN SUPRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TROJAN SUPRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRINCETON, NJ
PRINCETON, NJ
Princeton, NJ
Church & Dwight Virginia Co., Inc.
Colonial Heights, VA
Other trademarks owned by Church & Dwight Virginia Co., Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Schuman
David J. Schuman CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.469 North Harrison StreetLaw DepartmentPrinceton, NJ 08543Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Personal lubricants, spermicides, contraceptive gels, foams and sponges; anti-fungal preparations for the relief of athlete's foot, jock itch, ringworm and nail fungus; medicated pre-moistened towelettes and wipes; medicated lip balms; medicated foot and body powders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ARMKEL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Church & Dwight Virginia Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named TROJAN SUPRA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |