Drawing for SNAP DISK

USPTO serial 78292506

SNAP DISK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNAP DISK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALLYN TAYLOR

STACEY R HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92657UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, namely, file servers, filers, storage appliances, network attached storage, storage area network, block servers, virtual disk servers, application servers, object servers, disk drives, storage arrays, and storage switches; computer software, namely, software for the transfer of data over computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 4, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 4, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 4, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 17, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 30, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 15, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 15, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 31, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 19, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance