Drawing for EATON UNIVERSITY

USPTO serial 78292736

EATON UNIVERSITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EATON UNIVERSITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL S KALKA

DANIEL S KALKA EATON CORPORATION1111 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, INSTRUCTOR AND E-LEARNING EDUCATIONAL SERVICES BY MANNER OF COURSES, WORKSHOPS, AND SEMINARS FOR LEADERSHIP AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, PERSONAL PRODUCTIVITY, TEAM EFFECTIVENESS, FUNCTIONAL SKILLS IN VARIOUS PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINES COMPRISING ENGINEERING, HUMAN RESOURCES, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, FINANCE, ACCOUNTING, AND STRATEGIC PLANNINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2004GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance