Drawing for HIPERWOOD

USPTO serial 78293124

HIPERWOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIPERWOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Crimaldi

CHRISTOPHER B JACOBS RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR LLP1621 EUCLID AVE 19TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Melamine resin used to micro-encapsulate various materials to provide a material that is characterized by high scratch resistance, heat resistance, is flame retardant and has good mechanical properties for manufacturing automotive, maritime or aviation parts, for producing casings and parts for the household, sanitary, construction, furniture, leisure and sport industries, and for manufacturing grinding products, paper products and leather products.ACTIVE—
019Non-metal building materials, namely, rigid pipes for building, transportable buildings, wall panels, paving tiles, dividing curtain walls, floor, wall and roofing panels for buildings, and cladding; and nonluminous nonmechanical signs made of plasticACTIVE—
020Furniture; inflatable plastic signs; and dividing walls, namely free-standing office partitions.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance