USPTO serial 78293133
ZEN IN BLACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3008543Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZEN IN BLACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake Forest, IL
Lake Forest, IL
Lake Forest, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel Saldana
Rachel Saldana Baker Botts L.L.P.98 San Jacinto Blvd.1500 San Jacinto CenterAustin, TX 78701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Prepackaged coffee, tea and hot cocoa mixes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 3, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |