Drawing for PEROSSAL

USPTO serial 78293284

PEROSSAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2994244Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 13, 2005
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with PEROSSAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven B. Walmsley

Steven B. Walmsley Reising Ethington PC755 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1850Troy, MI 48084United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005[ Pharmaceutical preparations and materials for use in dentistry, namely, dental filling materials and cements; ] [ natural bone filling preparations; ] [ bone substitutes comprised of living tissue and bone graft substitutes comprised of living tissue, all in the nature of allografts, autografts, xenografts and composites thereof; ] medical products, namely, bone ceramics and bone cements for orthopedic and surgical applications with and without pharmaceutically active ingredients; antibiotic carrier materialACTIVE—
010Artificial bone filling preparations; bone substitutes comprised of artificial material and bone graft substitutes comprised of artificial material, all in the nature of calcium phosphates, calcium sulfates, [ absorbable polyesters ] and composites thereof; bone implants composed of artificial materials; jaw implantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2026NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
May 15, 2026RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 15, 202689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 15, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2026E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 29, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2015NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2015RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 17, 201589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 17, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 10, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 26, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 13, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
May 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance