USPTO serial 78293310
BOCHNER CHOCOLATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2005
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOCHNER CHOCOLATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Sullivan
JOHN J SULLIVAN17 LIBERTY STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FOODS, NAMELY, CANDY, [ COOKIES, CAKES, SORBETS, ICE CREAMS, ] AND SNACK MIXES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF [ CRACKERS, PRETZELS,] CANDIED NUTS [ AND/OR POPPED POPCORN ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 23, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |