USPTO serial 78293445
CLOVERSTUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOVERSTUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Kirkpatrick, Michelle R. Watts, and all other Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman attorneys
CALENDAR/DOCKETING DEPT PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPPO BOX 7880SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing computer games to others that may be accessed via the Internet, providing Internet games to others, providing electronic games for mobile telephones via the Internet, providing digital music via the Internet, electronic publishing services, namely, online publication of the text and graphic works of others featuring computer and video games and strategies thereof, providing on-line non-downloadable newsletters in the field of computer and video games, providing on-line non-downloadable electronic publications and documentation in the nature of articles and reports featuring computer and video game strategy, providing amusement arcade services; providing recreational facilities, video game arcades, amusement centers, amusement parks, entertainment services in the nature of providing for the use of slot machines; casinos, billiard parlors, dance halls and mahjong parlors; organization of entertainment competitions for others, motion picture theater services, production and distribution of motion pictures in the form of films, video tapes and optical disks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |