USPTO serial 78293510
WOOSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WOOSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Logsdon, Reg. No 22, 132
WILLIAM H LOGSDON REG NO 22 132 WEBB ZIESENHEIM LOGSDON ORKIN & HANSON700 KOPPERS BLDG 436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications apparatus and equipment, namely, modems including wireless modems, telephones including cellular telephones, computer hardware for the provision of telecommunications services, namely, computers used for communications, computer software used for the provision of telecommunications services, electronic and navigational and positioning apparatus including global positioning systems consisting of computers, computer software,transmitters, receivers and network interface devices, satellite navigational and positioning instruments, computer software for the retrieval of data, systems management, database management, computer aided design, and for locating people, vehicles, chattels and locations;, digital,magnetic and other devices in the nature of storage devices used for the storage of electronic information, namely, integrated circuit cards, memory chips, smart cards, telephone cards, SIMcards, and replacement parts, accessories and fittings in this class all for the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely--, the provision of internet services including wireless internet, and telephone services, broadcasting services, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network, providing multiple user dial[-up and dedicated access to the internet, providing access to fixed line and mobile communications networks,and telephone, facsimile, telex, data transfer, message collection and transmission, radio paging and electronic mail services, providing electronic transmission of data in the nature of text, images,sounds and video, providing digital content by means of telecommunications equipment, providing wireless application protocol services utilizing a secure communications network or otherwise providing video conferencing services, video telephone services, value added network services and communications by means of computer terminals; leasing and rental of telecommunications apparatus and equipment; leasing and rental of telephone communications apparatus and equipment for all the aforesaid; consulting and providing information in the field of telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |