USPTO serial 78293584
RIDGID. POWERFUL. DURABLE. PROFESSIONAL.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIDGID. POWERFUL. DURABLE. PROFESSIONAL.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALBERT B DEAVER
ALBERT B DEAVER LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLPATTN DOCKET CLERK 26TH FL600 TRAVIS, STE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002-3095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Thread cutting oils and lubricants | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Separators for the cleaning and purification of air | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Two-wheel carts for transporting power drives and vise stands | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Non-metallic guide hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Ladders, not of metal, pedestals for supporting bench grinders, support stands for drain cleaning equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Internal and external cleaning brushes, fitting brushes for use with copper cleaning machines, tube cleaning brushes and brushes for tube fittings for preparing tubes and fittings for soldering or brazing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ridgid, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ridgid, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named RIDGID. POWERFUL. DURABLE. PROFESSIONAL.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |