Drawing for LUMEXIS

USPTO serial 78293633

LUMEXIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUMEXIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive multi-media entertainment and computer systems for use in airplanes and land vehicles, namely, individual-seat video consoles, with options for movies on demand, video game programs, shopping and video information menus; interactive communication systems for use during the flight, namely, via facsimile, computer and in-cabin telephone and external telephone; both systems comprised of game controllers, keyboards, computer mouse and pointing devices, web cameras, mobile phones, phone headsets, individual passenger control units, individual seat interface units, monitors, seat column disconnect boxes, area distribution boxes, central processing units, namely, headend interface units, media server units, system control units, media network switches, data servers, application media server switchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 27, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 24, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 10, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 6, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 26, 2005WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2005WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance