Drawing for MAGELLAN SPORTSWEAR

USPTO serial 78294114

MAGELLAN SPORTSWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGELLAN SPORTSWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William G. Barber, Stephen P. Meleen, Susan J. Hightower, Louis T. Pirkey

WILLIAM G BARBER, STEPHEN P MELEEN, SU PIRKEY BARBER LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2120AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006General purpose metal storage casesACTIVE—
011Flashlights, propane camping lanterns and table lamps, propane camp stoves and heatersACTIVE—
018Storage trunksACTIVE—
020Sleeping bags; general purpose plastic and wood storage casesACTIVE—
021Soft-sided portable coolers, portable ice chests for food and beverages, thermo-electric portable coolersACTIVE—
022TentsACTIVE—
024Bed blankets and blanket throwsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 13, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 13, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 4, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 4, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 24, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 21, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 6, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance