USPTO serial 78294161
CHITOWN IS MY TOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHITOWN IS MY TOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, HATS, SHORTS, SKIRTS, PANTS, SOCKS | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lopez, Jose A.
- Other trademarks owned by Lopez, Jose A.
- Other trademarks owned by Nadick, Ryan
- Other trademarks owned by Nadick, Ryan
- Other trademarks owned by CHITOWN INNOVATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CHITOWN INNOVATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Rosenburg, Howard J.
- Other trademarks owned by Rosenburg, Howard J.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CHITOWN IS MY TOWN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |