USPTO serial 78294194
TORONTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2007
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TORONTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership
Toronto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership
Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership
Toronto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership
Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy DiConza
Nancy DiConza Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd St., 17th Fl.New York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAPER GOODS AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, [TRADING CARDS, POSTERS,] STICKERS, DECALS, [ WRITING PADS, NOTEPAPER, CALENDARS, UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS, DESK STANDS AND HOLDER FOR PENS, PENCILS AND INK] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named TORONTO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 27, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |