USPTO serial 78294292
FUT5AL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUT5AL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Schavey Ruff
DEBORAH SCHAVEY RUFF MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | sport bags, handbags, school bags, bags for athletic use, holdalls in the nature of sacks for athletic use, haversacks, rucksacks, luggage, wallets, purses, briefcases and umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Rugby and soccer jerseys and shorts, goal keepers' sweaters and shorts and pants, track suits, T-shirts, sweat tops, polo shirts, socks, shoes, gloves, fleece tops, track singlets and track shorts, jackets, shower jackets, training bibs, hats, caps and belts | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | sport balls, footballs and rugby balls, tennis racquets, squash racquets and badminton racquets, shin guards for athletic use, knee guards for athletic use, shoulder pads for athletic use, gloves specifically adapted for use in boxing, golf and baseball, bags specifically adapted to carry sports articles; sports training appliances and devices namely cones, flags and nets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |