USPTO serial 78294309
CLASSIC POOH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLASSIC POOH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Plotkin
Steven Plotkin The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetCorporate Legal- Trademark DepartmentBurbank, CA 91521-0643Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair shampoo; hair conditioner; hair mousse; hair cream rinse; skin cleansing cream; facial, hand, and body cream; facial, hand, and body lotion; facial, hand and body moisturizer; bath oil; bath powder; body powder; perfume; cologne; aftershave; bar soap; liquid soap; skin soap; mascara; lip stick; lip gloss; eyeliner; blush; rouge; eyeshadow; eyebrow pencils; nail polish; facial scrubs; facial masks; talcum powder; bubble bath; toilet water; dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |